Watch the briefing
Narrated walkthrough of the institutional deck -- share with SIU, compliance, finance, or GC.
HOW
- Ingest EDI / plan feeds into canonical claims (member tokenized where required).
- WAE path: rank waste · abuse · error by recoverable dollars for operational recovery -- not mixed into SIU fraud.
- RADV path: quantify HCC / risk-adjustment exposure with a documented self-disclosure package path.
- Fraud path: isolate provable fraud into sealed CREB® bundles for SIU / MFCU; RREB™ when AP needs collections framing.
WHY
- Most improper-payment dollars are WAE -- treating them as fraud burns SIU and weakens counsel.
- RADV / HCC cycles punish vague support; quantify exposure before the letter, not after.
- SIU and MFCU ask what you can prove -- sealed evidence, not alert counts.
- Hard payer/provider firewall: this console never mixes allegiances.
DIFFERENTIATORS
- Fraud vs WAE explicitly separated -- different programs, different handoffs.
- RADV / risk adjustment as a first-class program with self-disclosure readiness.
- Evidence is the product. Hybrid PQ seals (Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65). RFC3161 when a timestamp token is issued.
- Live demo data plane on /demo-MCO -- not a static marketing shell.
Share with stakeholders
The PowerPoint is built for a 10-minute executive walkthrough. The PDF is for email and procurement packs. Both match this page -- how the product works, why institutions buy it, and what makes JIL different (sealed evidence, not another alert dashboard).
CONFIDENTIAL · JIL Sovereign Technologies, Inc. Demo tenant presentation. Design vs as-built: seals and modules activate per engagement; professional judgment remains with SIU, clinicians, and counsel.